There’s no doubting the Pixel 3 is a great phone, but it never felt as premium, polished, or slick as some of the other leading devices in the category. One element of this could be attributed to Google’s image. One of the key aspects of luxury brands is desirability — in other words, the impression they give of opulence and exclusivity, something people want to be a part of. Apple has this attribute in spades. Google, on the other hand, doesn’t. This is most likely down to the nature of the company’s business. Rather than being known for making high-end, expensive products, Google provides free services (such as Search and Gmail) that are accessible by all. Due to this, there’ll always be a nagging feeling hanging over Google’s high-end equipment that, maybe, it’s just not as good as the stuff you can get from dedicated hardware makers. But enter the Pixel 3a and 3a XL. If you’re unaware, these are entry-level, affordable range of Google’s phones that were launched in May. Starting from $400, the devices have many of the same stand-out features of the company’s flagship devices (a fantastic camera, the best representation of Android, and impressive Google Assistant integration), but clock in at a much lower cost. On paper, the 3a range seems like the perfect move for Google: a device that’s available to almost everyone, but packed with top quality software features. The question is, does it live up to the hype? Well, watch our video at the top of the page to find out what we thought of the the Pixel 3a and 3a XL, and whether Google has finally found its phone niche. This post includes affiliate links to products that you can buy online. If you purchase them through our links, we get a small cut of the revenue.
